Association between calculated panel reactive antibody and waitlist outcomes in the 2018 heart allocation system.

BACKGROUND: The impact of heart transplant (HT) waitlist candidate sensitization on waitlist outcomes in the US is unknown. METHODS: Adult waitlist outcomes in OPTN (October 2018-September 2022) by calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) were modeled to identify thresholds of clinical significance. The primary outcome was the rate of HT by cPRA category (low: 0-35, middle: >35-90, high: >90) assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis (compete: waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration). The secondary outcome was waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration. RESULTS: The elevated cPRA categories were associated with lower rates of HT. Candidates in the middle (35-90) and high cPRA categories (>90) had an adjusted 24% lower rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.92) and 61% lower rate (HR 0.39 95% CI. 0.33-0.47) of HT than the lowest category, respectively. Waitlist candidates in the high cPRA category listed in the top acuity strata (Statuses 1, 2) had increased rates of delisting for death or deterioration compared to those in the low cPRA category (adjusted HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.5), however, elevated cPRA (middle, high) was not associated with an increased rate of death and delisting when the cohort was considered as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated cPRA was associated with reduced rates of HT across all waitlist acuity tiers. Among HT waitlist candidates listed at the top acuity strata, the high cPRA category was associated with increased rates of delisting due to death or deterioration. Elevated cPRA may require consideration for critically ill candidates under continuous allocation.

Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation.

Heart transplant candidates sensitized to HLA antigens wait longer for transplant, are at increased risk of dying while waiting, and may not be listed at all. The increasing prevalence of HLA sensitization and limitations of current desensitization strategies underscore the urgent need for a more effective approach. In addition to pregnancy, prior transplant, and transfusions, patients with end-stage heart failure are burdened with unique factors placing them at risk for HLA sensitization. These include homograft material used for congenital heart disease repair and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Moreover, these risks are often stacked, forming a seemingly insurmountable barrier in some cases. While desensitization protocols are typically implemented uniformly, irrespective of the mode of sensitization, the heterogeneity in success and post-transplant outcomes argues for a more tailored approach. Achieving this will require progress in our understanding of the immunobiology underlying the innate and adaptive immune response to these varied allosensitizing exposures. Further attention to B cell activation, memory, and plasma cell differentiation is required to establish methods that durably abrogate the anti-HLA antibody response before and after transplant. The contribution of non-HLA antibodies to the net state of sensitization and the potential implications for graft longevity also remain to be comprehensively defined. The aim of this review is to first bring forth select issues unique to the sensitized heart transplant candidate. The current literature on desensitization in heart transplantation will then be summarized providing context within the immune response. Building on this, newer approaches with therapeutic potential will be discussed emphasizing the importance of not only addressing the short-term pathogenic consequences of circulating HLA antibodies, but also the need to modulate alloimmune memory.

Association of Bw4/Bw6 mismatch across class I HLA loci with renal graft outcomes in first time transplants.

Bw4 and Bw6 are strongly immunogenic epitopes routinely assigned based on HLA-B typing results per Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policies. These public epitopes and their variants are shared by some cross-reactive HLA-A and -C antigens. Although epitope mismatch has been associated with poor transplant outcomes, previous studies did not find such associations for Bw4/6 mismatch as defined by HLA-B antigens only. We hypothesized that a broader definition for Bw4/Bw6 mismatch that includes cross-reactive HLA-A and -C antigens may reveal the risk associated with these epitopes. In this retrospective cohort study, we examined kidney transplantations between 2000 and 2016 in the OPTN database and determined the association of Bw4/6 mismatch across all class I HLA antigens and renal graft outcomes. Even by this broader definition, Bw4/6 mismatch was not independently associated with 1-year graft rejection (adjusted OR: 0.99, 95%CI 0.93-1.06) or death-censored graft survival (adjusted HR: 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.05). There was no significant association among recipients who were already sensitized at transplant either. Our findings suggest that Bw4/6 mismatch alone is not associated with poor renal graft outcomes despite their strong immunogenicity, and the load of epitope mismatches over a certain threshold is likely required to cause adverse clinical consequences.

Extended loci histocompatibility matching in HSCT-Going beyond classical HLA.

Unrelated haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has evolved from an experimental protocol to a potentially curative first-line treatment in a variety of haematologic malignancies. The continuous refinement of treatment protocols and supportive care paired with ongoing achievements in the technological field of histocompatibility testing enabled this transformation. Without a doubt, HLA matching is still the foremost criterion for donor selection in unrelated HSCT. However, HSCT-related treatment complications still occur frequently, often resulting in patients suffering severely or even dying as a consequence of such complications. Current literature indicates that other immune system modulating factors may play a role in the setting of HSCT. In this review, we discuss the current clinical evidence of a possible influence of nonclassical HLA antigens HLA-E, HLA-F, and HLA-G as well as the HLA-like molecules MICA and MICB, in HSCT.

Abrogating biologics interference in flow cytometric crossmatching.

The flow cytometric crossmatch is currently the gold standard for evaluating donor and recipient histocompatibility. The assay however does have limitations and is sensitive to false positive reactions resulting from the presence of non-HLA antibodies or therapy related immune biologics. Such false positive reactions can lead to the inappropriate decline of an acceptable donor organ or unnecessary therapeutic intervention. Here we describe the successful validation of anti-idiotype blocking antibodies in prevention of false positive flow crossmatch results caused by biologic therapy. Blocking antibodies specific for the Fab portion of Rituximab and/or Alemtuzumab were incubated with biologic containing patient serum prior to use in flow cytometric crossmatching. Biologic blocking successfully negated false positive crossmatch results with Rituximab (B cell ave. % change = -97%) or Alemtuzumab (T cell ave. % change = -99%, B cell ave. % change = -95%) infused sera respectively. Simultaneous blocking of these biologics was also successful. A complex case is presented to demonstrate the application of this procedure.

Current Approaches to Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Major advancements in the development of HLA antibody detection techniques and our understanding of the outcomes of solid organ transplant in the context of HLA antibody have occurred since the relevance of sensitization was first recognized nearly 50 years ago. Additionally, kidney paired donation programs (KPD) have become widespread, deceased donor allocation policies have changed, and several new therapeutic options have become available with promise to reduce HLA antibody. In this overview we aim to provide thoughtful guidance about when desensitization in kidney transplantation should be considered taking into account the outcomes of HLA incompatible transplantation. Novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future study will also be discussed. While most of our understanding about desensitization comes from studying kidney transplant candidates and recipients, many of the concepts discussed can be easily applied to desensitization in all of solid organ transplantation.

Haplo-identical or mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for Fanconi anemia: Results from the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the EBMT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative option for bone marrow failure or hematopoietic malignant diseases for Fanconi anemia (FA) patients. Although results have improved over the last decades, reaching more than 90% survival when a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donor is available, alternative HCT donors are still less reported. We compared HCT outcomes using HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD; n = 123) or haplo-identical donors (HDs), either using only in vivo T cell depletion (n = 33) or T cells depleted in vivo with some type of graft manipulation ex vivo (n = 59) performed for FA between 2000 and 2018. Overall survival (OS) by 24 months was 62% (53-71%) for MMUD, versus 80% (66-95%) for HDs with only in vivo T cell depletion and 60% (47-73%) for HDs with in vivo and ex vivo T cell depletion (p = .22). Event-free survival (EFS) was better for HD-transplanted FA patients with only in vivo T cell depletion 86% (73-99%) than for those transplanted from a MMUD 58% (48-68%) or those with graft manipulation 56% (42-69%) (p = .046). Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 41% (MMUD) versus 40% (HDs with no graft manipulation) versus 17% (HDs with T cell depleted graft), (p = .005). No differences were found for the other transplant related outcomes. These data suggest that HDs might be considered as an alternative option for FA patients with better EFS using unmanipulated grafts.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry.

Matching strategies based on HLA eplets instead of HLA antigens in solid organ transplantation may not only increase the donor pool for highly sensitized patients, but also decrease the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody formation. However, since not all eplets are equally capable of inducing an immune response, antibody verification is needed to confirm their ability to be bound by antibodies, such that only clinically relevant eplets are considered. The HLA Epitope Registry has documented all theoretically defined HLA eplets along with their antibody verification status and has been the foundation for many clinical studies investigating eplet mismatch in transplantation. The verification methods for eplets in the Registry range from polyclonal sera from multi- and uni-parous women to murine and human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and antibodies purified by adsorption and elution from sera of HLA immunized individuals. The classification of antibody verification based on different methods for validation is problematic, since not all approaches represent the same level of evidence. In this study, we introduce a classification system to evaluate the level of evidence for the antibody-verified status of all eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry. We demonstrate that for a considerable number of eplets, the antibody-verified status is solely based on polyclonal serum reactivity of multiparous women or on reactivity of murine mAbs. Furthermore, we noted that a substantial proportion of patient sera analyses and human mAb data presented in the HLA Epitope Registry Database has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore, we tested several unpublished human HLA-specific mAbs by luminex single antigen beads assay to analyze their HLA reactivity for eplet antibody verification. Although the majority of analyzed mAbs indeed verified their assigned eplets, this was not the case for a number of eplets. This comprehensive overview of evidence for antibody verification of eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry is instrumental for future investigations towards eplet immunogenicity and clinical studies considering antibody-verified eplet mismatch in transplantation and warrants further standardization of antibody verification using high quality data.

Permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in HCT depend on immunopeptidome divergence and editing by HLA-DM.

In hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches between patients and their unrelated donors are associated with improved outcomes compared with nonpermissive mismatches, but the underlying mechanism is incompletely understood. Here, we used mass spectrometry, T-cell receptor-ß (TCRß) deep sequencing, and cellular in vitro models of alloreactivity to interrogate the HLA-DP immunopeptidome and its role in alloreactive T-cell responses. We find that permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches display significantly higher peptide repertoire overlaps compared with their nonpermissive counterparts, resulting in lower frequency and diversity of alloreactive TCRß clonotypes in healthy individuals and transplanted patients. Permissiveness can be reversed by the absence of the peptide editor HLA-DM or the presence of its antagonist, HLA-DO, through significant broadening of the peptide repertoire. Our data establish the degree of immunopeptidome divergence between donor and recipient as the mechanistic basis for the clinically relevant permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in HCT and show that permissiveness is dependent on HLA-DM-mediated peptide editing. Its key role for harnessing T-cell alloreactivity to HLA-DP highlights HLA-DM as a potential novel target for cellular and immunotherapy of leukemia.

Immunological follow-up of patients with renal transplants: A proposal for clinical practice in Colombia / Seguimiento inmunológico después de trasplante renal: una propuesta para la práctica clínica en Colombia.

Graft damage is a process that starts at the moment of transplantation, due to comorbidities of receptor, donor status, ischemia time, ischemia-reperfusion phenomenon, among others, those induce metabolic and immune factors that ultimately trigger clinical manifestations of graft dysfunction. However, the preclinical progression between the time of transplantation and the appearance of signs and symptoms of graft damage can take weeks to years. Therefore, the implementation of rational monitoring approaches during the post-transplantation period is critical and should include not only the clinical follow-up but also anticipate immunological graft damage. In the present essay, we propose an immunological monitoring algorithm for the post-renal transplantation period.

El daño del injerto es un proceso multifactorial que se inicia tempranamente después de la mayoría de los trasplantes de donantes sin HLA idéntico. Puede deberse a las comorbilidades del receptor, al estado del donante, al tiempo de isquemia, y al fenómeno de isquemia y reperfusión, entre otros, condiciones que inducen factores metabólicos e inmunológicos que finalmente desembocan en la disfunción del injerto. Sin embargo, entre el momento del trasplante y la aparición de los signos y síntomas existe un periodo que puede tardar semanas o años. Por ello, después del trasplante renal, es importante hacer un seguimiento racional que incluya la evaluación clínica y permita anticiparse al daño inmunológico del injerto. En este ensayo se propone un algoritmo de seguimiento del injerto renal después del trasplante.

The Connection Between Minor H Antigens and Neoantigens and the Missing Link in Their Prediction.

For hundreds of thousands of years, the human genome has extensively evolved, resulting in genetic variations in almost every gene. Immunological reflections of these genetic variations become clearly visible after an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) as minor Histocompatibility (H) antigens. Minor H antigens are peptides cleaved from genetically encoded variable protein regions after which they are presented at the cell surface by HLA molecules. After allo-SCT with minor H antigen mismatches between donor and recipient, donor T cells recognize the minor H antigens of the recipient as foreign, evoking strong alloreactive immune responses. Studies in the late eighties have discovered that a subset of minor H antigens are encoded by hematopoietic system-specific genes. After allo-SCT, this subset is strictly expressed on the hematopoietic malignant cells and was therefore the first well-defined highly immunogenic group of tumor-specific antigens. In the last decade, neoantigens derived from genetic mutations in tumors have been identified as another group of immunogenic tumor-specific antigens. Therefore, hematopoietic minor H antigens and neoantigens are therapeutic equivalents. This review will connect our current knowledge about the immune biology and identification of minor H antigens and neoantigens leading to novel conclusions on their prediction.

HLA-specific memory B-cell detection in kidney transplantation: Insights and future challenges.

Humoral alloimmunity mediated by anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is a major challenge in kidney transplantation and impairs the longevity of the transplanted organ. The immunological risk of an individual patient is currently mainly assessed by detection of HLA antibodies in the serum, which are produced by long-lived bone marrow-residing plasma cells. However, humoral alloimmunity is complex, and alloreactive memory B cells constitute an additional factor in the interplay of immune cells. These recirculating "silent" cells are responsible for the immunological recall response by differentiating into antibody-producing cells upon antigen re-encounter. Historically, due to the lack of appropriate and routinely applicable assays to determine the presence and HLA specificity of alloreactive memory B cells, their contribution to the humoral alloimmune response has clinically often been suspected but could not be determined. In this review, we give an overview of recent advances in techniques to detect alloreactive memory B cells and discuss their strengths and limitations. Furthermore, we summarize experiences with these techniques in alloimmunized individuals and transplant recipients, thereby emphasizing unmet needs to be addressed in future studies.

Non-donor specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are not associated with poor outcome in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Testing for anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has now become standard practice in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and anti-HLA antibodies (both donor specific and non-donor specific) are being identified and have many potential consequences. Most studies suggest that donor-specific HLA antibodies lead to adverse outcomes, though little is reported on non-donor specific anti-HLA antibodies. We present the results of a retrospective cohort analysis of 157 patients who received HSCT at the University of Rochester over a period of four years. We identified 45 patients (28.7%) who had detectable anti-HLA antibodies, while only one patient (0.6%) had donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Patients with prior pregnancies and multiple transfusions were at increased risk to develop antibodies. In our cohort, the presence of non-donor specific anti-HLA antibodies did not significantly impact overall survival, progression free survival, graft failure, or transplant-related mortality.

Transplanting the Untransplantable.

With implementation of the Kidney Allocation System, the growth of kidney paired donation programs, and advances in desensitization and immunosuppression, the outlook for "untransplantable" kidney transplantation candidates has never been more promising. The Kidney Allocation System prioritized compatible matches for candidates with calculated panel-reactive antibody levels of 98%, 99%, or 100% and broadened allocation of non-A1 and non-A1-B subgroup kidneys to blood group type B candidates. Concurrently, the growth of kidney paired donation programs and use of incompatible transplantation as part of kidney paired donation to achieve "more compatible" kidney transplantation has improved options for candidates with an incompatible living donor. Finally, advances in desensitization and immunosuppression have strengthened the ability to manage donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection. Although no patient should be labeled "untransplantable" due to blood group type or donor-specific antibody, all candidates should be provided with individualized and realistic counseling regarding their anticipated wait times for deceased donor or kidney paired donation matching, with early referral to expert centers when needed. In this Perspective, we consider blood group type ABO incompatibility, HLA antigen incompatibility, antibody-mediated rejection, kidney paired donation, and recent developments in incompatible transplantation in more depth and recommend an approach to the sensitized candidate.

Non-HLA donor-recipient mismatches in kidney transplantation-A stone left unturned.

In kidney transplantation, short-term allograft survival has improved due to improvements in acute rejection episodes without corresponding improvements in long-term survival. Although current organ allocation algorithms take into account human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching to reduce antidonor alloimmune responses, it is likely that genomic variation at non-HLA loci (ie, non-HLA donor-recipient [D-R] pair mismatches) play a role in the "non-self" responses and ultimately affect long-term allograft survival. Existing data from both animal models and human studies suggest an association between non-HLA D-R mismatches and kidney allograft outcomes. In this minireview, we examine existing and emerging data and discuss putative mechanisms on the role of non-HLA D-R mismatches on long-term allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation.

Mother-child histocompatibility and risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus among mothers.

The study objective was to test the hypothesis that having histocompatible children increases the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), possibly by contributing to the persistence of fetal cells acquired during pregnancy. We conducted a case control study using data from the UC San Francisco Mother Child Immunogenetic Study and studies at the Inova Translational Medicine Institute. We imputed human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and minor histocompatibility antigens (mHags). We created a variable of exposure to histocompatible children. We estimated an average sequence similarity matching (SSM) score for each mother based on discordant mother-child alleles as a measure of histocompatibility. We used logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 138 RA, 117 SLE, and 913 control mothers were analyzed. Increased risk of RA was associated with having any child compatible at HLA-B (OR 1.9; 1.2-3.1), DPB1 (OR 1.8; 1.2-2.6) or DQB1 (OR 1.8; 1.2-2.7). Compatibility at mHag ZAPHIR was associated with reduced risk of SLE among mothers carrying the HLA-restriction allele B*07:02 (n = 262; OR 0.4; 0.2-0.8). Our findings support the hypothesis that mother-child histocompatibility is associated with risk of RA and SLE.

PIRCHE-II: an algorithm to predict indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes in solid organ transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches between donors and recipients may lead to alloreactivity after solid organ transplantation. Over the last few decades, our knowledge of the complexity of the HLA system has dramatically increased, as numerous new HLA alleles have been identified. As a result, the likelihood of alloreactive responses towards HLA mismatches after solid organ transplantation cannot easily be assessed. Algorithms are promising solutions to estimate the risk for alloreactivity after solid organ transplantation. In this review, we show that the recently developed PIRCHE-II (Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes) algorithm can be used to minimize alloreactivity towards HLA mismatches. Together with the use of other algorithms and simulation approaches, the PIRCHE-II algorithm aims for a better estimated alloreactive risk for individual patients and eventually an improved graft survival after solid organ transplantation.

T cell reconstitution after lymphocyte depletion features a different pattern of inhibitory receptor expression in ABO- versus HLA-incompatible kidney transplant recipients.

Chronic antigen stimulation can lead to immune exhaustion (a state of T cell dysfunction). Several phenotypical signatures of T cell exhaustion have been described in various pathological situations, characterized by aberrant expression of multiple inhibitory receptors (IR). This signature has been barely studied in the context of allogenic organ transplantation. We undertook a cross-sectional analysis of the expression of IR [CD244, CD279, T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin (Ig) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) domains (TIGIT) and CD57] and their correlation with cytokine-producing functions in T cells reconstituting after lymphocyte depletion in patients transplanted from living donors, with preformed donor-specific antibodies. After ABO incompatible transplantation, T cells progressively acquired a phenotype similar to healthy donors and the expression of several IR marked cells with increased functions, with the exception of TIGIT, which was associated with decreased cytokine production. In stark contrast, T cell reconstitution in patients with anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was characterized with an increased co-expression of IR by T cells, and specifically by an increased expression of TIGIT. Furthermore, expression of these receptors was no longer directly correlated to cytokine production. These results suggest that T cell alloreactivity in HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation drives an aberrant T cell reconstitution with respect to IR profile, which could have an impact on the transplantation outcome.

Two Occurrences of Leukemia Relapse Due to Mismatched HLA Loss After Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation From Different Family Donors With KIR Ligand Mismatch.

Mismatched HLA loss is a cause of leukemia relapse after HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT). We report a patient with a history of 2 occurrences of leukemia relapse due to mismatched HLA loss after haplo-SCT. He received haplo-SCT from his father but showed leukemia relapse with loss of the maternal HLA haplotype. He then underwent haplo-SCT from his mother, and developed relapse with loss of the paternal HLA haplotype. Both donors had killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor-ligand mismatch but alloreactive natural killer cells could not prevent relapse. Second haplo-SCT should be conducted carefully for patients with relapse due to mismatched HLA loss.

Identification of New Soluble Factors Correlated With the Development of Graft Failure After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Graft failure is a severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The mechanisms involved in this phenomenon are still not completely understood; data available suggest that recipient T lymphocytes surviving the conditioning regimen are the main mediators of immune-mediated graft failure. So far, no predictive marker or early detection method is available. In order to identify a non-invasive and efficient strategy to diagnose this complication, as well as to find possible targets to prevent/treat it, we performed a detailed analysis of serum of eight patients experiencing graft failure after T-cell depleted HLA-haploidentical HSCT. In this study, we confirm data describing graft failure to be a complex phenomenon involving different components of the immune system, mainly driven by the IFNγ pathway. We observed a significant modulation of IL7, IL8, IL18, IL27, CCL2, CCL5 (Rantes), CCL7, CCL20 (MIP3a), CCL24 (Eotaxin2), and CXCL11 in patients experiencing graft failure, as compared to matched patients not developing this complication. For some of these factors, the difference was already present at the time of infusion of the graft, thus allowing early risk stratification. Moreover, these cytokines/chemokines could represent possible targets, providing the rationale for exploring new therapeutic/preventive strategies.